Search by topic:


Time to re-set the opportunities for our children and grandchildren

post-image

Australians face many issues today, and we can take action to impact some more than others.  

Action on climate change is essential, but the impact of our contribution to the global challenge is minimal.    

Things are different regarding the economy and opportunities for coming generations. We can re-set our taxation framework and government spending patterns to reduce debt and boost chances for all.  

We need a community-wide deliberation on how to share the load in building a more robust economy and ladder of opportunity for future generations.



What do you think?


You must be logged in to post a comment.
Comments
Ricky T @ 2022.08.10 12:22 PM

Actually we can do something about man-made climate issues because of the vast resources we export (coal, iron ore, LNG, lithium and other) but I would prefer we did it in a managed, gradual, sensible way that doesn't bankrupt Australia and simply cause importing nations to switch to another (often dirtier) supplier.

However, I do agree with your central point, though I don't know how we can do so in practice. Our elected representatives are charged with doing exactly what you suggest, but I (and probably you & most of the rest of the electorate) have little faith that they will do much beyond short-term political advantage. 

How else to proceed?  The Royal Commission process has lost much credibility in recent years. Identifying fraud in Queensland served a worthy end years ago, but the Financial Services RC lasted as long as people realised that banks had started to lend responsibly (i.e. not to them) so that demand & property prices went down and the Aged Care RC has precipitated a financial crisis in providers to which the wider public appears oblivious and/or uninterested. Enquiries into taxation and superannuation? We've had a few.  Community forums? Well, you can hold them, but they need someone to pick up the outcomes and run with them. 

If you're interested, my view is that we need a baseline universal basic income, encouragement to work above that income to make more money, abolition of numerous bullshit jobs, massive reduction in Centrelink, the ATO and other government organisations, inheritance tax and simplification across the board. Sir Humphrey Appleby, eat your heart out.

So, yes, but I'd appreciate your thoughts on the mechanisms for change.


Glenn Barnes @ 2022.08.11 6:50 AM

Ricky T,

Thank you for your thoughtful comments.

In these times of low trust in politicians and political processes change is hard. The one mechanism for producing meaningful answers to such wicked issues that appears to move past community cynicism and produce constructive outcomes is the use of citizen juries (The jury is randomly drawn from the population but structured to give a spread of representation that allows all citizens to feel that views close to their own have been considered. The deliberations are given broad publicity so the community can follow the developments. A clear set of outcomes are drawn up by the jury and presented to the public and politicians to catalyse action.) 

In this case, we should look to have a citizen's jury seeking to answer: "How should we fund the essential public services required to produce and sustain the Australian society we aspire to?" The jury outcomes then present our politicians with an "if not, why not" resolution for this challenge.



Related Posts

Governance

post-image

The soul in the machine
5 December 2022 by Maria MacNama... 0 Comments

Governance

post-image

A public policy framework that has legal force
26 November 2022 by IdeaSpies 0 Comments

Governance

post-image

National Reconstruction Fund
17 November 2022 by Maria MacNama... 1 Comments